The Dark Web is a popular online marketplace that’s been around for more than a decade. However, its origins go back even further, to the early 1990s, when it was known as “the Hidden Wiki.” Today, the site boasts millions of users and tens of thousands of listings per week. It offers everything from illegal drugs to stolen credit cards, weapons, and identity theft tools. 

With all this activity going on, you might think that monitoring the Dark Web would be easy. But you’d be wrong. The Dark Web is one of the most difficult places to monitor in the world. In fact, experts believe that many cybercriminals use the Dark Web to conduct their business. 

But how do you stop cybercrime if criminals are using the Dark Web to carry out their activities? Should law enforcement agencies focus on the Dark Web or should they look elsewhere? And what about private parties who want to track criminal activity on the Dark Web? Can they monitor the sites themselves? Or will they have to rely on the government to do so? Let’s take a closer look at these questions. 

Why Is the Dark Web So Difficult to Monitor? 

There are three main reasons why the Dark Web makes monitoring such an arduous task. First, there’s the sheer number of sites that make up the network. Second, there’s the lack of cooperation among various Dark Web operators. Finally, there’s the constant changes in the way the Dark Web works.

The monitoring of the Darkweb link list is a difficult task. A person should have the complete detail of the procedure that is available for the people. If the person will do the monitoring after proper analysis then he will be able to get the good results. The person should focus on working for the benefits of the people in the long run.

When we talk about the Dark Web, we’re not necessarily talking about the deep web itself. The deep web is a vast, largely untapped resource of information. It can be accessed via specific search terms, but it’s still not something that anyone can access with just a few clicks. Instead, we’re referring to the dark net, which is the part of the web that isn’t indexed by search engines. By definition, the Dark Web has no indexing whatsoever. 

There’s a lot of overlap between the two, but they are different things. The deep web includes hidden pages and other content that is intentionally designed to evade normal search engine algorithms. The dark net, on the other hand, includes hidden services, which are websites that don’t have any obvious URLs. These services are accessible only using special software, which means that they aren’t visible to search engines like Google. 

These services tend to include file sharing networks, cryptocurrency exchanges, and other types of anonymous marketplaces. They also serve as places where people can exchange sensitive personal data (like bank account numbers) without fear of getting caught. Some of them are very well-known, while others remain relatively unknown. For example, Silk Road, once the biggest online drug market in the world, is now gone. Its operator was arrested in 2013. In its place, there are dozens of competing markets that are trying to fill the void left behind by Silk Road. 

If you wanted to find everything available on the Dark Web, it would likely take months — if not years — of effort. That’s because there are just too many sites to keep track of. The Dark Web is so large that it can easily overwhelm anyone attempting to monitor it. 

What Are the Problems With Monitoring the Dark Web? 

Now that we’ve established that monitoring the Dark Web isn’t easy (or feasible), let’s examine some of the problems associated with doing so. First, it’s nearly impossible to control what goes on within the Dark Web. This is especially true after the Silk Road bust in 2013. There were several other major markets operating during that time, including AlphaBay, Hansa Market, and Agora. Each of those markets had thousands of listings, making it a lot harder for authorities to take down the entire network. 

In addition, some of the Dark Web sites have been compromised and used to distribute malware. If you were trying to catch criminals in action, you wouldn’t want to get infected yourself. And, of course, there’s always the risk that someone else’s IP address could get taken over by a hacker and used to commit crimes. 

Finally, the Dark Web is constantly evolving. Every time a new service appears, it has to be monitored and added to the database. While this process may seem simple enough, it’s actually quite complicated. There are lots of websites, each with hundreds of unique domains, making it nearly impossible to keep track of all of them. 

How Has Law Enforcement Responded to the Problem? 

Law enforcement officials have responded to the problem in different ways. Most simply try to monitor each individual site. Others have tried to develop specialized software that can detect suspicious activity. Still others have tried to infiltrate the Dark Web itself and gather intelligence. Here is a sampling of the methods that have been used: 

Conducting undercover operations. These operations involve posing as legitimate users and buying or selling items on the Dark Web. Police officers then attempt to build cases against the site owners based on the evidence collected. This method is effective, but it also carries a high degree of risk. The undercover officer must prove himself/herself worthy before gaining the trust of a Dark Web user.

Monitoring the traffic coming into and out of the Dark Web. This is a bit less risky than the previous option. Using special software, police officers can watch the traffic that comes into and leaves the Dark Web. This allows law enforcement to see who is visiting certain sites and what they’re looking for. While this gives law enforcement the ability to identify potential victims, it doesn’t provide much insight into the actual criminal activity. 

Using informants. Informants are individuals who are willing to work with law enforcement agencies to solve specific cases. Sometimes, they are paid for their efforts; sometimes, they are simply asked to help. Either way, informants often know a great deal about the inner workings of the Dark Web. However, they’re not allowed to share that information publicly. As a result, they must operate under cover. 

Gathering intelligence through infiltration. This is similar to the undercover method described above, except that it involves agents infiltrating the site in question rather than posing as customers. Once inside, they attempt to learn as much as possible about the operation. They might spend hours upon hours doing research or performing other tasks. Their goal is to gain a level of understanding that will allow them to predict future actions and prevent crime from taking place. Infiltration is a dangerous tactic that requires considerable skill. 

It seems clear that the best way to slow down cybercrime is to reduce the opportunities for criminals to operate. But given the problems associated with monitoring the Dark Web, it’s unlikely that any method will completely eliminate the threat. Instead, law enforcement needs to focus on reducing the number of opportunities for cybercriminals to carry out attacks. Fortunately, there are plenty of ways to do that.